lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:40:22 -0700
From:	Daniel Phillips <daniel@...nq.net>
To:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<tux3@...3.org>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: Tux3 Report: How fast can we fsync?

On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 9:42:43 AM PDT, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> [dbench bakeoff]
>
> With dbench v4.00, tux3 seems to be king of the max_latency hill, but
> btrfs took throughput on my box.  With v3.04, tux3 took 1st place at
> splashing about in pagecache, but last place at dbench -S.
>
> Hohum, curiosity satisfied.

Hi Mike,

Thanks for that. Please keep in mind, that was our B team, it does a
full fs sync for every fsync. Maybe a rematch when the shiny new one
lands? Also, hardware? It looks like a single 7200 RPM disk, but it
would be nice to know. And it seems, not all dbench 4.0 are equal.
Mine doesn't have a -B option.

That order of magnitude latency difference is striking. It sounds
good, but what does it mean? I see a smaller difference here, maybe
because of running under KVM.

Your results seem to confirm the gap I noticed between Ext4 and XFS
on the one hand and Btrfs and Tux3 on the other, with the caveat that
the anomalous dbench -S result is probably about running with the
older fsync code. Of course, this is just dbench, but maybe something
to keep an eye on.

Regards,

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ