[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4RrH4rc1SAqKkLCZ5rHYr1-c=57sAGfcbprjTAbSvCY7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 22:51:41 +0200
From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To: David Lang <david@...g.hm>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Havoc Pennington <hp@...ox.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lukasz Skalski <l.skalski@...sung.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
Hi
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:43 PM, David Lang <david@...g.hm> wrote:
> If the justification for why this needs to be in the kernel is that you
> can't reliably prevent apps from exiting if there are pending messages, [...]
It's not.
> the answer of "preventing apps from exiting if there are pending messages
> isn't a sane thing to try and do" is a direct counter to that justification
> for including it in the kernel.
It's optionally used for reliable exit-on-idle.
Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists