[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150429213744.GA12552@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:37:44 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Mark Williamson <mwilliamson@...o-software.com>,
Mark Seaborn <mseaborn@...omium.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Finn Grimwood <fgrimwood@...o-software.com>,
Daniel James <djames@...o-software.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: Regression: Requiring CAP_SYS_ADMIN for /proc/<pid>/pagemap
causes application-level breakage
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 02:18:49PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> <kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> >
> > This sounds too ugly to be exposed it as ABI.
>
> Oh, pretty it ain't. However, regressions in many ways are worse. If
> it makes it possible to not regress...
One idea is to extend kcmp(2) with KCMP_PAGE. idx1 and idx2 are virtual
addresses in two processes. It returns 0 if addresses points to the same
page and 3 otherwise.
Would it be enough for the use case?
I guess it could be too slow to check one page a time...
Invent new kcmpv(2)? ;)
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists