linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] watchdog: add watchdog

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:26:44 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
	chai wen <chaiw.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
	Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
	Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
	Ben Zhang <benzh@...omium.org>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux.com>,
	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] watchdog: add watchdog_cpumask sysctl to assist
 nohz

On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:37:17 -0400 Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com> wrote:

> Change the default behavior of watchdog so it only runs on the
> housekeeping cores when nohz_full is enabled at build and boot time.
> Allow modifying the set of cores the watchdog is currently running
> on with a new kernel.watchdog_cpumask sysctl.
> 
> If we allowed the watchdog to run on nohz_full cores, the timer
> interrupts and scheduler work would prevent the desired tickless
> operation on those cores.  But if we disable the watchdog globally,
> then the housekeeping cores can't benefit from the watchdog
> functionality.  So we allow disabling it only on some cores.
> See Documentation/lockup-watchdogs.txt for more information.
> 
> ...
>  
> +watchdog_cpumask:
> +
> +This value can be used to control on which cpus the watchdog may run.
> +The default cpumask is all possible cores, but if NO_HZ_FULL is
> +enabled in the kernel config, and cores are specified with the
> +nohz_full= boot argument, those cores are excluded by default.
> +Offline cores can be included in this mask, and if the core is later
> +brought online, the watchdog will be started based on the mask value.
> +
> +Typically this value would only be touched in the nohz_full case
> +to re-enable cores that by default were not running the watchdog,
> +if a kernel lockup was suspected on those cores.

Now the reader is wondering "how the heck do I specify a cpumask".  Is
it hex encoded?  decimal?  binary string?  Which bit corresponds to
which CPU?

A little example would help things along.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/