| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKohpondhNBhWBjspSSoBUz-V605K+4UEqQFdTCqRd=Yc-RXCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:14:21 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: arm_big_little: add SCPI interface driver
On 27 April 2015 at 17:10, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> index 4f3dbc8cf729..9e678bf1687c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> @@ -24,6 +24,15 @@ config ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ
> This add the CPUfreq driver support for Versatile Express
> big.LITTLE platforms using SPC for power management.
>
> +config ARM_SCPI_CPUFREQ
> + tristate "SCPI based CPUfreq driver"
> + depends on ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ && ARM_SCPI_PROTOCOL
> + help
> + This add the CPUfreq driver support for ARM big.LITTLE platforms
> + using SCPI interface for CPU power management.
> +
> + This driver works only if firmware the supporting CPU DVFS adhere
> + to SCPI protocol.
Wanna reword that ?
>
> config ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ
> tristate "SAMSUNG EXYNOS CPUfreq Driver"
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> index cdce92ae2e8b..02fc9f849d4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SA1110_CPUFREQ) += sa1110-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SPEAR_CPUFREQ) += spear-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_TEGRA_CPUFREQ) += tegra-cpufreq.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ) += vexpress-spc-cpufreq.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SCPI_CPUFREQ) += scpi-cpufreq.o
>
> ##################################################################################
> # PowerPC platform drivers
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4c2c11a9dfc6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
> +/*
> + * SCPI CPUFreq Interface driver
> + *
> + * It provides necessary ops to arm_big_little cpufreq driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 ARM Ltd.
> + * Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> +#include <linux/scpi_protocol.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include "arm_big_little.h"
> +
> +static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
> +
> +static int scpi_init_opp_table(struct device *cpu_dev)
> +{
> + u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
> + struct scpi_dvfs_info *info;
> + struct scpi_opp *opp;
> + int idx, ret = 0;
> +
> + if ((dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev)) > 0)
> + return 0;
Why, who would have added it ?
> + info = scpi_ops->dvfs_get_info(domain);
Isn't calling this twice costly for getting the same information ?
> + if (IS_ERR(info))
> + return PTR_ERR(info);
> +
> + opp = info->opps;
> + if (!opp)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + for (idx = 0; idx < info->count; idx++, opp++) {
> + ret = dev_pm_opp_add(cpu_dev, opp->freq, opp->m_volt * 1000);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_warn(cpu_dev, "failed to add opp %uHz %umV\n",
> + opp->freq, opp->m_volt);
Don't you want to free earlier OPPs here ?
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int scpi_get_transition_latency(struct device *cpu_dev)
> +{
> + u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
> + struct scpi_dvfs_info *info;
> +
> + info = scpi_ops->dvfs_get_info(domain);
> + if (IS_ERR(info))
> + return PTR_ERR(info);
> +
> + return info->latency;
> +}
> +
> +static struct cpufreq_arm_bL_ops scpi_cpufreq_ops = {
> + .name = "scpi",
> + .get_transition_latency = scpi_get_transition_latency,
> + .init_opp_table = scpi_init_opp_table,
Don't want to free/remove OPPs ?
> +};
> +
> +static int scpi_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + scpi_ops = get_scpi_ops();
> + if (!scpi_ops)
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + return bL_cpufreq_register(&scpi_cpufreq_ops);
> +}
> +
> +static int scpi_cpufreq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + bL_cpufreq_unregister(&scpi_cpufreq_ops);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver scpi_cpufreq_platdrv = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "scpi-cpufreq",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = scpi_cpufreq_probe,
> + .remove = scpi_cpufreq_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(scpi_cpufreq_platdrv);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
GPL V2 ?
Author/Description missing ..
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists