[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5541F209.8070302@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:12:41 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>,
Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@...il.com>
CC: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
Am 30.04.2015 um 11:05 schrieb Łukasz Stelmach:
> Regardless, of initrd issues I feel there is a need of a local IPC that
> is more capable than UDS. Linus Torvalds is probably right that
> dbus-daemon is everything but effictient. I disagree, however, that it
> can be optimised and therefore solve *all* issues kdbus is trying to
> address. dbus-deamon, by design, can't some things. It can't transmitt
> large payloads without copying them. It can't be made race-free.
This is true.
But as long dbus-deamon is not optimized as much as possible there is no reason
to force push kdbus.
As soon dbus-deamon exploits all kernel interfaces as much it can and it still needs
work (may it performance or other stuff) we can think of new kernel features which
can help dbus-deamon.
Thanks,
//richard
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists