[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1430391243-7112-6-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:54:02 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
david.vrabel@...rix.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
jeremy@...p.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org, akataria@...are.com,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
gleb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] x86: switch config from UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK to INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
There is no need any more for a special treatment of _raw_spin_unlock()
regarding inlining compared to the other spinlock functions. Just treat
it like all the other spinlock functions.
Remove selecting UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK in case of PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 -
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | 2 +-
kernel/Kconfig.locks | 7 ++++---
kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 3 +--
kernel/locking/spinlock.c | 2 +-
lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 -
6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 226d569..4f85c7e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -666,7 +666,6 @@ config PARAVIRT_DEBUG
config PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
bool "Paravirtualization layer for spinlocks"
depends on PARAVIRT && SMP
- select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
---help---
Paravirtualized spinlocks allow a pvops backend to replace the
spinlock implementation with something virtualization-friendly
diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
index 5344268..839a804 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(raw_spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
#define _raw_spin_trylock_bh(lock) __raw_spin_trylock_bh(lock)
#endif
-#ifndef CONFIG_UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
+#ifdef CONFIG_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
#define _raw_spin_unlock(lock) __raw_spin_unlock(lock)
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
index 08561f1..9cc5f72 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
@@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ
config ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE
bool
-config UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
- bool
-
#
# lock_* functions are inlined when:
# - DEBUG_SPINLOCK=n and GENERIC_LOCKBREAK=n and ARCH_INLINE_*LOCK=y
@@ -132,6 +129,10 @@ config INLINE_SPIN_LOCK_IRQSAVE
def_bool y
depends on !GENERIC_LOCKBREAK && ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_LOCK_IRQSAVE
+config INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
+ def_bool y
+ depends on !PREEMPT || ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
+
config INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_BH
def_bool y
depends on ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_BH
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
index 3f9c974..6aca8987 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.preempt
@@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ config PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY
config PREEMPT
bool "Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop)"
select PREEMPT_COUNT
- select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK if !ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
help
This option reduces the latency of the kernel by making
all kernel code (that is not executing in a critical section)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
index db3ccb1..0e2b531 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock.c
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ void __lockfunc _raw_spin_lock_bh(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_raw_spin_lock_bh);
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
+#ifndef CONFIG_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
void __lockfunc _raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock)
{
__raw_spin_unlock(lock);
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 1767057..0b4cc3c 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -920,7 +920,6 @@ config RT_MUTEX_TESTER
config DEBUG_SPINLOCK
bool "Spinlock and rw-lock debugging: basic checks"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
- select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK
help
Say Y here and build SMP to catch missing spinlock initialization
and certain other kinds of spinlock errors commonly made. This is
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists