[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150430115828.GB15874@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:58:28 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 16/28] mm, thp: remove compound_lock
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 06:11:08PM +0200, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> On 04/23/2015 11:03 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > We are going to use migration entries to stabilize page counts. It means
>
> By "stabilize" do you mean "protect" from concurrent access? I've seen
> that you use the same term in seemingly the same sense several times (at
> least in patches 15, 16, 23, 24 and 28).
Here it's protect from concurrent change of page's ->_count or
->_mapcount.
In some context I could you "stabilize" as "protect from concurrent
split".
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists