linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/3] sysfs,kernfs: add flush operation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150430131159.GC17936@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:11:59 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	"Kweh, Hock Leong" <hock.leong.kweh@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] sysfs,kernfs: add flush operation

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:09:45PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> From: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>
> 
> This is necessary to allow sysfs operations to return error in close (we are
> using close to initiate and return a possible error from a transaction).
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...n.com>

Are there any side-affects now that we have a flush() call for binary
files that the vfs will act differently from not defining one at all?

if not, no objection to me for this change.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/