linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150430135018.GH32373@arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:50:18 +0100
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	"al.stone@...aro.org" <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"leo.duran@....com" <leo.duran@....com>,
	"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年04月29日 22:42, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:31:03AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >> On 04/29/2015 09:04 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >>> Any plans for ACPI on 32-bit ARM?
> >>
> >> Not that I am aware, but I could be totally wrong. The reason I am adding
> >> this here for 32-bit ARM is because the ACPI spec mentioned this.
> >>
> >> If you think this is not necessary until we introduce ACPI for ARM32, it can
> >> be removed.
> >
> > I think it should be removed (as long as ACPI cannot be selected on
> > arm32).
> 
> I agree.
> 
> Now there is no plan for ARM32 ACPI as I know, ACPI for ARM targets
> for ARM64 based enterprise system at now.

While we're at it, do we *really* need to support CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER
on arm64? It's a deprecated /proc/acpi interface and it would be nice to
avoid introducing deprecated behaviour if we can avoid it.

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/