linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] drivers: CCI: fix used_mask init in validate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150430143852.GC32190@leverpostej>
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:38:52 +0100
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc:	Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@....com>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] drivers: CCI: fix used_mask init in validate_group()

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 03:03:07PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 14:33 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > Could you please send this to arm-soc as suggested by Will, with the 
> > > > relevant acks/reviews  ?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I sent it on Tuesday. Did it not show up? Is arm@...nel.org the correct
> > > address? I got the cc:
> > > 
> > > From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> > > To: arm@...nel.org
> > > Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH V2] drivers: CCI: fix used_mask init in validate_group()
> > > Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:09:32 -0400
> > > Message-Id: <1430240972-16386-1-git-send-email-msalter@...hat.com>
> > 
> > That's the right address, but that only goes to the maintainers, and
> > doesn't get copied to any list. In future, please Cc linux-arm-kernel in
> > addition.
> 
> That's where I sent it originally.

Sure, but it's good to Cc when sending to arm-soc so as to make it
visible that the patches have been sent. Doing so avoids the necessity
of queries like Suzuki's, and makes it possible for others to reply to
the version sent to arm@...nel.org in the case of conflicts or other
issues.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/