[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150430040525.GA15238@voom.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:05:25 +1000
From: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel v9 09/32] vfio: powerpc/spapr: Rework groups
attaching
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:29:30PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 12:16 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> >On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:14:33PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>This is to make extended ownership and multiple groups support patches
> >>simpler for review.
> >>
> >>This should cause no behavioural change.
> >
> >Um.. this doesn't appear to be true. Previously removing a group from
> >an enabled container would fail with EBUSY, now it forces a disable.
>
>
> This is the original tce_iommu_detach_group() where I cannot find EBUSY you
> are referring to; it did and does enforce disable. What do I miss
> here?
Sorry, my mistake. I misread the patch.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists