linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 linux-next] cpufreq: pxa: replace typedef pxa_freqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1161092225.77460.1430418536315.open-xchange@webmail.nmp.proximus.be>
Date:	Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:28:56 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 linux-next] cpufreq: pxa: replace typedef pxa_freqs_t
 by structure



> On 30 April 2015 at 06:46 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 21:32 +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> > typedef is not really useful here. Replace it by structure
> > to improve readability.typedef should only be used in some cases.
> > (See Documentation/CodingStyle Chapter 5 for details).
>
> trivia:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
> > b/drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c
> []
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static unsigned int sdram_rows;
> >  /* Use the run mode frequencies for the CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE policy
> >*/
> >  #define CCLKCFG                    CCLKCFG_TURBO | CCLKCFG_FCS
> > 
> > -static pxa_freqs_t pxa255_run_freqs[] =
> > +static struct pxa_freqs pxa255_run_freqs[] =
>
> Should these be const?

AFAICS yes but this needs some fixes:
drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c: In function 'find_freq_tables':
drivers/cpufreq/pxa2xx-cpufreq.c:218:15: warning: assignment discards 'const'
qualifier from pointer target type
    *pxa_freqs = pxa255_run_freqs;
               ^
Maybe another patch ?

Regards,
Fabian
>
> >  {
> >     /* CPU   MEMBUS  CCCR  DIV2 CCLKCFG                run  turbo PXbus
> >SDRAM */
> >     { 99500,  99500, 0x121, 1,  CCLKCFG, -1, -1},   /*  99,   99,   50, 
> > 50  */
> > @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static pxa_freqs_t pxa255_run_freqs[] =
> >  };
> > 
> >  /* Use the turbo mode frequencies for the CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE policy
> >*/
> > -static pxa_freqs_t pxa255_turbo_freqs[] =
> > +static struct pxa_freqs pxa255_turbo_freqs[] =
> >  {
> >     /* CPU   MEMBUS  CCCR  DIV2 CCLKCFG        run  turbo PXbus SDRAM */
> >     { 99500, 99500,  0x121, 1,  CCLKCFG, -1, -1},   /*  99,   99,   50, 
> > 50  */
> > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(pxa255_turbo_table, "Selects the
> > frequency table (0 = run table
> >     ((HT) ? CCLKCFG_HALFTURBO : 0) | \
> >     ((T)  ? CCLKCFG_TURBO : 0))
> > 
> > -static pxa_freqs_t pxa27x_freqs[] = {
> > +static struct pxa_freqs pxa27x_freqs[] = {
> >     {104000, 104000, PXA27x_CCCR(1,  8, 2), 0, CCLKCFG2(1, 0, 1),  900000,
> >1705000 },
> >     {156000, 104000, PXA27x_CCCR(1,  8, 3), 0, CCLKCFG2(1, 0, 1), 1000000,
> >1705000 },
> >     {208000, 208000, PXA27x_CCCR(0, 16, 2), 1, CCLKCFG2(0, 0, 1), 1180000,
> >1705000 },
> > @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ extern unsigned get_clk_frequency_khz(int info);
> > 
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_REGULATOR
> > 
> > -static int pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(pxa_freqs_t *pxa_freq)
> > +static int pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(struct pxa_freqs *pxa_freq)
> >  {
> >     int ret = 0;
> >     int vmin, vmax;
> > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void __init pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages(void)
> >     }
> >  }
> >  #else
> > -static int pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(pxa_freqs_t *pxa_freq)
> > +static int pxa_cpufreq_change_voltage(struct pxa_freqs *pxa_freq)
> >  {
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void __init pxa_cpufreq_init_voltages(void) { }
> >  #endif
> > 
> >  static void find_freq_tables(struct cpufreq_frequency_table **freq_table,
> > -                        pxa_freqs_t **pxa_freqs)
> > +                        struct pxa_freqs **pxa_freqs)
> >  {
> >     if (cpu_is_pxa25x()) {
> >             if (!pxa255_turbo_table) {
> > @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ static unsigned int pxa_cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
> >  static int pxa_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int idx)
> >  {
> >     struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pxa_freqs_table;
> > -   pxa_freqs_t *pxa_freq_settings;
> > +   struct pxa_freqs *pxa_freq_settings;
> >     unsigned long flags;
> >     unsigned int new_freq_cpu, new_freq_mem;
> >     unsigned int unused, preset_mdrefr, postset_mdrefr, cclkcfg;
> > @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int pxa_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy
> > *policy)
> >     int i;
> >     unsigned int freq;
> >     struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pxa255_freq_table;
> > -   pxa_freqs_t *pxa255_freqs;
> > +   struct pxa_freqs *pxa255_freqs;
> > 
> >     /* try to guess pxa27x cpu */
> >     if (cpu_is_pxa27x())
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/