[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55427D83.3060900@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:07:47 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@...escale.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mturquette@...aro.org,
shawn.guo@...aro.org, b29396@...escale.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ranjani.Vaidyanathan@...escale.com, b20596@...escale.com,
r64343@...escale.com, b20788@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/5] clk: add missing lock when call clk_core_enable
in clk_set_parent
On 04/15/15 07:26, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> clk_core_enable is executed without &enable_clock in clk_set_parent function.
> Adding it to avoid potential race condition issue.
>
> Fixes: 035a61c314eb ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances")
> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@...escale.com>
> ---
Can you please describe the race condition? From what I can tell there
is not a race condition here and we've gone around on this part of the
code before to fix any race conditions.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists