[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVZXBRtQidZJ7=CXD_AkKkjL0JkJQAeZz44rk5ckpLDfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:17:35 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
linux@...elenboom.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hypervisor/x86/xen: Unset X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS on Xen
PV guests
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com> wrote:
> Commit 61f01dd941ba ("x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor
> attribute issue") makes AMD processors set SS to __KERNEL_DS in
> __switch_to() to deal with cases when SS is NULL.
>
> This breaks Xen PV guests who do not want to load SS with__KERNEL_DS.
>
> Since the problem that the commit is trying to address would have to be
> fixed in the hypervisor (if it in fact exists under Xen) there is no
> reason to set X86_BUG_SYSRET_SS_ATTRS flag for PV VPCUs here.
>
Seems reasonable.
Have you run the test case on a Xen PV guest on AMD? It's possible
that Xen is affected, since the old accidental workaround that we
deleted was in the vdso and probably would have worked on Xen.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists