[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150430.163742.1867744843397612112.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:37:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tcamuso@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
manish.chopra@...gic.com, sony.chacko@...gic.com,
rajesh.borundia@...gic.com, nhorman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netxen_nic: use spin_[un]lock_bh around tx_clean_lock
From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 07:51:27 -0400
> While testing this driver with DEBUG_LOCKDEP and DEBUG_SPINLOCK
> enabled did not produce any traces, it would be more prudent in the
> case of tx_clean_lock to use spin_[un]lock_bh, since this lock is
> manipulated in both the process and softirq contexts.
>
> This patch was tested for functionality and regressions with netperf
> and DEBUG_LOCKDEP and DEBUG_SPINLOCK enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@...hat.com>
Applied, thanks Tony.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists