[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55429497.6030409@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:46:15 +0200
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>,
Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <rmk+linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] clk: si5351: Do not pass struct clk in platform_data
On 30.04.2015 21:16, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth
> <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com> wrote:
>> Michael is right, the check is for bailing out if none of the parent
>> clocks is available.
>
> + if (IS_ERR(drvdata->pxtal) && IS_ERR(drvdata->pclkin)) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "missing at least one parent clock\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> Then shouldn't the error message be: "missing both parent clocks\n" ?
Yeah, probably. I'll reword the error message and also check the
variant as only 5351C can have a "clkin" parent clock.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists