[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5542B96E.2020400@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:23:26 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64, asm: Work around AMD SYSRET SS descriptor attribute
issue
On 04/30/2015 02:39 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> This is the microbenchmark I used.
>
> For the record, Intel's intention going forward is that 0F 1F will
> always be as fast or faster than any other alternative.
>
I probably should have added that the microbenchmark specifically tests
for an atomic 5-byte NOP (as required by tracepoints etc.) If the
requirement for 5-byte atomic is dropped there might be faster
combinations, e.g. 66 66 66 90 might work better on some platforms, or
using very long 0F 1F sequences.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists