linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: i2o: Remove unwanted semicolon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1430472480.2878.397.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 May 2015 10:28:00 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)" <hgujulan@...teon.com>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"somyaanand214@...il.com" <somyaanand214@...il.com>,
	"iskaranth@...il.com" <iskaranth@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: i2o: Remove unwanted semicolon

On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 09:41 +0200, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:25:48PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:14:06 +0200
> > "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 13:43 +0000, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > This patch removes unwanted semicolon around close braces of code blocks
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The i2o driver moved into staging ready to be deleted unless someone
> > > > steps up with hardware willing to maintain it (which is rather
> > > > unlikely).
> > > 
> > > I think it's now time to delete these, want me to do that for 4.2?  I
> > > can queue that up in my tree now, so that we don't see any more cleanup
> > > patches being made for them?
> > 
> > Yeah I think it can go....
> 
> I was about to delete it, but what about drivers/scsi/dpt/dpti_i2o.* ?
> Should that be removed as well?

Possibly but that ought to go via staging and really is one for the SCSI
folks to call. The dpt_i2o was a bit more common than i2o proper.

Alan


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/