[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150501110123.GU22845@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 12:01:23 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc: Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@...keon.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Regulator: mc34708: Add DT binding documentation
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> a commit message would be nice and the subject should specify dt-bindings
> instead of regulator subsystem.
No, it shouldn't. DT bindings for a subsystem go through the subsystem
and the subsystem maintainer needs to see them to read them.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists