[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOiHx==fAPcji2=zjmO+m6yBX1xgB83XQk4+WgYgop=L4uZq7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 13:57:13 +0200
From: Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>
To: Ben Shelton <ben.shelton@...com>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
MTD Maling List <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Westfahl <jeff.westfahl@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Introduce CONFIG_MTD_RESERVE_END
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Ben Shelton <ben.shelton@...com> wrote:
> The reason for doing this as a Kconfig option rather than with an additional
> partition is that we use the same .itb boot image (and kernel arguments) for
> a series of embedded controllers that have different NAND flash sizes, and we
> use the '-' command line parameter to give the root partition all the available
> space after the other partitions.
Wouldn't it make more sense to make cmdlineparts to recognize if it is
run on a nand flash that has on-flash BBT enabled, and then reduce the
SIZE_REMAINING partition's size by the amount of nand_bbt_descr's
maxblocks * erase block size?
Currently your proposed solution would break if boards have differing
erase block sizes, or if some have NOR flash, which makes it an option
for a rather narrow use case IMHO.
Regards
Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists