linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Regulator: mc34708: Add DT binding documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150501140321.GZ22845@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 1 May 2015 15:03:21 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Martin Fuzzey <mfuzzey@...keon.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Regulator: mc34708: Add DT binding documentation

On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> hat am 1. Mai 2015 um 13:01 geschrieben:

> > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:34:21PM +0200, Stefan Wahren wrote:

> > > a commit message would be nice and the subject should specify dt-bindings
> > > instead of regulator subsystem.

> > No, it shouldn't. DT bindings for a subsystem go through the subsystem
> > and the subsystem maintainer needs to see them to read them.

> sorry for my bad expressing. 

> I tought the subject line should be something like:

> DT: add binding documentation for mc34708 regulator

No, it shouldn't.  The subject line should start "regulator: " like all
other regulator commits.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)