[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150501164639.GA19158@dyad.arnhem.chello.nl>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 18:46:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Optimize variable_test_bit()
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 06:33:29PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:03:32AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > PPS. Jakub, I see gcc5.1 still hasn't got output operands for asm goto;
> > > is this something we can get 'fixed' ?
>
> CCing Richard as author of asm goto and Vlad as register allocator
> maintainer. There are a few enhancement requests to support this, like
> http://gcc.gnu.org/PR59615 and http://gcc.gnu.org/PR52381 , but indeed the
> reason why no outputs are allowed is the register allocation issue.
> Don't know if LRA would be better suited to handle that case, but it would
> indeed be pretty hard.
So it would b awesome if we could use these freshly modeled flags as output
for regular asm stmts; that would obviate much of the asm goto hackery we now
do/have and allow gcc to pick the right branch for likely/unlikely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists