lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 20:18:56 +0000 From: "Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@...l.gov> To: 'Julia Lawall' <julia.lawall@...6.fr> CC: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>, "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org" <HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org> Subject: RE: [HPDD-discuss] [PATCH 2/11] Staging: lustre: fld: Use kzalloc and kfree >> >From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr> >> > >> >Replace OBD_ALLOC, OBD_ALLOC_WAIT, OBD_ALLOC_PTR, and OBD_ALLOC_PTR_WAIT by >> >kalloc/kcalloc, and OBD_FREE and OBD_FREE_PTR by kfree. >> >> Nak: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org> >> >> A simple replace will not work. The OBD_ALLOC and OBD_FREE functions allocate memory >> anywhere from one page to 4MB in size. You can't use kmalloc for the 4MB allocations. >> Currently lustre uses a 4 page water mark to determine if we allocate using vmalloc. Even >> using kmalloc for 4 pages has shown high failure rates on some systems. It gets even more >> messy with 64K page systems like ppc64 boxes. Now I'm not suggesting to port the larger >> allocations to vmalloc either since issues have been founded with using vmalloc. For example >> when using large stripe count files the MDS rpc generated crosses the 4 page line and vmalloc >> is used. Using vmalloc caused a global spinlock to be taken which causes meta data operations >> to serialized on the MDS servers. > >It's not the LARGE functions that do the switching? For example OBD_ALLOC >ends up at __OBD_MALLOC_VERBOSE, which as far as I can see calls kmalloc >(with __GFP_ZERO, and hance the use of kzalloc). Yes the LARGE functions do the switching. I was expecting also patches to remove the OBD_ALLOC_LARGE functions as well which is not the case here. I do have one question still. The macro __OBD_MALLOC_VERBOSE allowed the ability to simulate memory allocation failures at a certain percentage rate. Does something exist in the kernel to duplicate that functionality? Once these macros are gone we lose the ability to simulate high memory allocation failures. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists