[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DCD755EC-27E3-47CB-9016-D76CBA27AB6C@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 20:49:26 +0000
From: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
To: "Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@...l.gov>
CC: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org" <HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org>
Subject: Re: [HPDD-discuss] [PATCH 2/11] Staging: lustre: fld: Use kzalloc
and kfree
On May 1, 2015, at 4:18 PM, Simmons, James A. wrote:
> Yes the LARGE functions do the switching. I was expecting also patches to remove the
> OBD_ALLOC_LARGE functions as well which is not the case here. I do have one question still. The
> macro __OBD_MALLOC_VERBOSE allowed the ability to simulate memory allocation failures at
> a certain percentage rate. Does something exist in the kernel to duplicate that functionality?
> Once these macros are gone we lose the ability to simulate high memory allocation failures.
Yes, there are things like https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/25/64
So I think the API is even riher compared to what our old wrapper code was able to do.
Bye,
Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists