linux-kernel - Re: [HPDD-discuss] [PATCH 2/11] Staging: lustre: fld: Use kzalloc and kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA8D4D3B-39CB-4DE4-835D-047692A7E5DE@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 May 2015 20:52:37 +0000
From:	"Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	"Simmons, James A." <simmonsja@...l.gov>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
	"HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org" <HPDD-discuss@...1.01.org>
Subject: Re: [HPDD-discuss] [PATCH 2/11] Staging: lustre: fld: Use kzalloc
 and kfree


On May 1, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 08:36:05PM +0000, Simmons, James A. wrote:
>>> We are hopefully going to get rid of OBD_ALLOC_LARGE() as well, though.
>>> 
>>> It's simple enough to write a function:
>>> 
>>> void *obd_zalloc(size_t size)
>>> {
>>> 	if (size > 4 * PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
>>> 		return vzalloc(size);
>>> 	else
>>> 		return kmalloc(size, GFP_NOFS);
>>> }
>>> 
>>> Except, huh?  Shouldn't we be using GFP_NOFS for the vzalloc() side?
>>> There was some discussion of that GFP_NOFS was a bit buggy back in 2010
>>> (http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=128942194520631&w=4) but the current
>>> lustre code doesn't try to pass GFP_NOFS.
>> 
>> The version in the upstream client is out of date. The current macro in the Intel master
>> Branch is:
> 
> That's not helpful at all, why do we even have an in-kernel version of
> this code if you don't do your development in the kernel?
> 
> Please sync with the kernel tree very soon, or I'm just going to delete
> this whole thing.  This is getting _really_ frustrating.

The patch was submitted.
But it depends on a symbol that's not exported.
I was not able to change that.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg83997.html

Bye,
    Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/