| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20150502185855.040989247@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 20:58:50 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ian Malone <ibmalone@...il.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.0 015/220] sched/idle/x86: Restore mwait_idle() to fix boot hangs, to improve power savings and to improve performance
4.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
commit b253149b843f89cd300cbdbea27ce1f847506f99 upstream.
In Linux-3.9 we removed the mwait_idle() loop:
69fb3676df33 ("x86 idle: remove mwait_idle() and "idle=mwait" cmdline param")
The reasoning was that modern machines should be sufficiently
happy during the boot process using the default_idle() HALT
loop, until cpuidle loads and either acpi_idle or intel_idle
invoke the newer MWAIT-with-hints idle loop.
But two machines reported problems:
1. Certain Core2-era machines support MWAIT-C1 and HALT only.
MWAIT-C1 is preferred for optimal power and performance.
But if they support just C1, cpuidle never loads and
so they use the boot-time default idle loop forever.
2. Some laptops will boot-hang if HALT is used,
but will boot successfully if MWAIT is used.
This appears to be a hidden assumption in BIOS SMI,
that is presumably valid on the proprietary OS
where the BIOS was validated.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60770
So here we effectively revert the patch above, restoring
the mwait_idle() loop. However, we don't bother restoring
the idle=mwait cmdline parameter, since it appears to add
no value.
Maintainer notes:
For 3.9, simply revert 69fb3676df
for 3.10, patch -F3 applies, fuzz needed due to __cpuinit use in
context For 3.11, 3.12, 3.13, this patch applies cleanly
Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ian Malone <ibmalone@...il.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/345254a551eb5a6a866e048d7ab570fd2193aca4.1389763084.git.len.brown@intel.com
[ Ported to recent kernels. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h | 8 +++++++
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mwait.h
@@ -30,6 +30,14 @@ static inline void __mwait(unsigned long
:: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx));
}
+static inline void __sti_mwait(unsigned long eax, unsigned long ecx)
+{
+ trace_hardirqs_on();
+ /* "mwait %eax, %ecx;" */
+ asm volatile("sti; .byte 0x0f, 0x01, 0xc9;"
+ :: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx));
+}
+
/*
* This uses new MONITOR/MWAIT instructions on P4 processors with PNI,
* which can obviate IPI to trigger checking of need_resched.
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <asm/syscalls.h>
#include <asm/idle.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <asm/mwait.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>
#include <asm/fpu-internal.h>
#include <asm/debugreg.h>
@@ -399,6 +400,49 @@ static void amd_e400_idle(void)
default_idle();
}
+/*
+ * Intel Core2 and older machines prefer MWAIT over HALT for C1.
+ * We can't rely on cpuidle installing MWAIT, because it will not load
+ * on systems that support only C1 -- so the boot default must be MWAIT.
+ *
+ * Some AMD machines are the opposite, they depend on using HALT.
+ *
+ * So for default C1, which is used during boot until cpuidle loads,
+ * use MWAIT-C1 on Intel HW that has it, else use HALT.
+ */
+static int prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+ if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * MONITOR/MWAIT with no hints, used for default default C1 state.
+ * This invokes MWAIT with interrutps enabled and no flags,
+ * which is backwards compatible with the original MWAIT implementation.
+ */
+
+static void mwait_idle(void)
+{
+ if (!need_resched()) {
+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR))
+ clflush((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags);
+
+ __monitor((void *)¤t_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
+ smp_mb();
+ if (!need_resched())
+ __sti_mwait(0, 0);
+ else
+ local_irq_enable();
+ } else
+ local_irq_enable();
+}
+
void select_idle_routine(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -412,6 +456,9 @@ void select_idle_routine(const struct cp
/* E400: APIC timer interrupt does not wake up CPU from C1e */
pr_info("using AMD E400 aware idle routine\n");
x86_idle = amd_e400_idle;
+ } else if (prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt(c)) {
+ pr_info("using mwait in idle threads\n");
+ x86_idle = mwait_idle;
} else
x86_idle = default_idle;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists