[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150502190120.081054719@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 21:00:31 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19 009/177] net/mlx4_en: Prevent setting invalid RSS hash function
3.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
[ Upstream commit b37069090b7c5615610a8aa6b36533d67b364d38 ]
mlx4_en_check_rxfh_func() was checking for hardware support before
setting a known RSS hash function, but didn't do any check before
setting unknown RSS hash function. Need to make it fail on such values.
In this occasion, moved the actual setting of the new value from the
check function into mlx4_en_set_rxfh().
Fixes: 947cbb0 ("net/mlx4_en: Support for configurable RSS hash function")
Signed-off-by: Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c | 29 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_ethtool.c
@@ -983,20 +983,21 @@ static int mlx4_en_check_rxfh_func(struc
struct mlx4_en_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
/* check if requested function is supported by the device */
- if ((hfunc == ETH_RSS_HASH_TOP &&
- !(priv->mdev->dev->caps.flags2 & MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG2_RSS_TOP)) ||
- (hfunc == ETH_RSS_HASH_XOR &&
- !(priv->mdev->dev->caps.flags2 & MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG2_RSS_XOR)))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (hfunc == ETH_RSS_HASH_TOP) {
+ if (!(priv->mdev->dev->caps.flags2 & MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG2_RSS_TOP))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (!(dev->features & NETIF_F_RXHASH))
+ en_warn(priv, "Toeplitz hash function should be used in conjunction with RX hashing for optimal performance\n");
+ return 0;
+ } else if (hfunc == ETH_RSS_HASH_XOR) {
+ if (!(priv->mdev->dev->caps.flags2 & MLX4_DEV_CAP_FLAG2_RSS_XOR))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (dev->features & NETIF_F_RXHASH)
+ en_warn(priv, "Enabling both XOR Hash function and RX Hashing can limit RPS functionality\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
- priv->rss_hash_fn = hfunc;
- if (hfunc == ETH_RSS_HASH_TOP && !(dev->features & NETIF_F_RXHASH))
- en_warn(priv,
- "Toeplitz hash function should be used in conjunction with RX hashing for optimal performance\n");
- if (hfunc == ETH_RSS_HASH_XOR && (dev->features & NETIF_F_RXHASH))
- en_warn(priv,
- "Enabling both XOR Hash function and RX Hashing can limit RPS functionality\n");
- return 0;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
static int mlx4_en_get_rxfh(struct net_device *dev, u32 *ring_index, u8 *key,
@@ -1070,6 +1071,8 @@ static int mlx4_en_set_rxfh(struct net_d
priv->prof->rss_rings = rss_rings;
if (key)
memcpy(priv->rss_key, key, MLX4_EN_RSS_KEY_SIZE);
+ if (hfunc != ETH_RSS_HASH_NO_CHANGE)
+ priv->rss_hash_fn = hfunc;
if (port_up) {
err = mlx4_en_start_port(dev);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists