lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150502190121.617301593@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat,  2 May 2015 21:01:07 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19 045/177] drivers/base: cacheinfo: validate device node for all the caches

3.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

commit 8a7d95f95c95f396decbd4cda6d4903fc4664946 upstream.

On architectures that depend on DT for obtaining cache hierarcy, we need
to validate the device node for all the cache indices, failing to do so
might result in wrong information being exposed to the userspace.

This is quite possible on initial/incomplete versions of the device
trees. In such cases, it's better to bail out if all the required device
nodes are not present.

This patch adds checks for the validation of device node for all the
caches and doesn't initialise the cacheinfo if there's any error.

Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/base/cacheinfo.c |   13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
@@ -62,15 +62,21 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned
 		return -ENOENT;
 	}
 
-	while (np && index < cache_leaves(cpu)) {
+	while (index < cache_leaves(cpu)) {
 		this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
 		if (this_leaf->level != 1)
 			np = of_find_next_cache_node(np);
 		else
 			np = of_node_get(np);/* cpu node itself */
+		if (!np)
+			break;
 		this_leaf->of_node = np;
 		index++;
 	}
+
+	if (index != cache_leaves(cpu)) /* not all OF nodes populated */
+		return -ENOENT;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -189,8 +195,11 @@ static int detect_cache_attributes(unsig
 	 * will be set up here only if they are not populated already
 	 */
 	ret = cache_shared_cpu_map_setup(cpu);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_warn("Unable to detect cache hierarcy from DT for CPU %d\n",
+			cpu);
 		goto free_ci;
+	}
 	return 0;
 
 free_ci:


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ