linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 02/92] tcp: fix possible deadlock in tcp_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150502190110.478966793@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sat,  2 May 2015 21:02:17 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 02/92] tcp: fix possible deadlock in tcp_send_fin()

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit d83769a580f1132ac26439f50068a29b02be535e ]

Using sk_stream_alloc_skb() in tcp_send_fin() is dangerous in
case a huge process is killed by OOM, and tcp_mem[2] is hit.

To be able to free memory we need to make progress, so this
patch allows FIN packets to not care about tcp_mem[2], if
skb allocation succeeded.

In a follow-up patch, we might abort tcp_send_fin() infinite loop
in case TIF_MEMDIE is set on this thread, as memory allocator
did its best getting extra memory already.

This patch reverts d22e15371811 ("tcp: fix tcp fin memory accounting")

Fixes: d22e15371811 ("tcp: fix tcp fin memory accounting")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c |   20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -2595,6 +2595,21 @@ begin_fwd:
 	}
 }
 
+/* We allow to exceed memory limits for FIN packets to expedite
+ * connection tear down and (memory) recovery.
+ * Otherwise tcp_send_fin() could loop forever.
+ */
+static void sk_forced_wmem_schedule(struct sock *sk, int size)
+{
+	int amt, status;
+
+	if (size <= sk->sk_forward_alloc)
+		return;
+	amt = sk_mem_pages(size);
+	sk->sk_forward_alloc += amt * SK_MEM_QUANTUM;
+	sk_memory_allocated_add(sk, amt, &status);
+}
+
 /* Send a fin.  The caller locks the socket for us.  This cannot be
  * allowed to fail queueing a FIN frame under any circumstances.
  */
@@ -2617,11 +2632,14 @@ void tcp_send_fin(struct sock *sk)
 	} else {
 		/* Socket is locked, keep trying until memory is available. */
 		for (;;) {
-			skb = sk_stream_alloc_skb(sk, 0, sk->sk_allocation);
+			skb = alloc_skb_fclone(MAX_TCP_HEADER,
+					       sk->sk_allocation);
 			if (skb)
 				break;
 			yield();
 		}
+		skb_reserve(skb, MAX_TCP_HEADER);
+		sk_forced_wmem_schedule(sk, skb->truesize);
 		/* FIN eats a sequence byte, write_seq advanced by tcp_queue_skb(). */
 		tcp_init_nondata_skb(skb, tp->write_seq,
 				     TCPHDR_ACK | TCPHDR_FIN);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/