[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1430601408-12847-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 23:16:48 +0200
From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
To: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
HPDD-discuss@...ts.01.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: obd_support: Add obd_cpt_alloc function
Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as a
function, obd_cpt_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
---
Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should
the call to kzalloc_node with the call to cfs_cpt_spread_node just be
inlined into the call sites?
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
index 2991d2e..3d380f0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
@@ -655,6 +655,15 @@ do { \
#define OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR(ptr, cptab, cpt) \
OBD_CPT_ALLOC(ptr, cptab, cpt, sizeof(*(ptr)))
+static inline void *obd_cpt_alloc(struct cfs_cpt_table *cptab, int cpt,
+ size_t size, gfp_t flags)
+{
+ return (cptab) == NULL ?
+ kzalloc(size, flags) :
+ kzalloc_node(size, flags, cfs_cpt_spread_node(cptab, cpt));
+}
+
+
# define __OBD_VMALLOC_VEROBSE(ptr, cptab, cpt, size) \
do { \
(ptr) = cptab == NULL ? \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists