[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150502235800.GC27804@kwestfie-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 16:58:09 -0700
From: Kenneth Westfield <kwestfie@...eaurora.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
Kenneth Westfield <kwestfie@...eaurora.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/14] ASoC: qcom: add no osr clk flag to lpass
variant
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:17:24PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Some LPASS integrations like on APQ8016 do not have OSR clk, so adding
> no osr clk bit would allow such integrations to use lpass driver.
Going forward, as the code is generalized, perhaps having an enable flag
for each clock, rather than a flag that negates an existing clock?
Or checking that the clock pointer is NULL after probing would be the
indication?
> sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> sound/soc/qcom/lpass.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
Kenneth Westfield
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists