[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <554693DD.6090208@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 14:32:13 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review
On 05/03/2015 01:00 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Build error:
>
> net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c: In function 'cgroup_mt':
> net/netfilter/xt_cgroup.c:42:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'sk_fullsock'
>
> 3.19.y and 4.0.y are being rebuilt right mow, so maybe you fixed that
> problem as well as the same failure in 4.0.y. I'll resend my report for 3.19.y
> and wait with the report for 4.0.y until after the rebuild is complete.
>
Another build failure, affecting powerpc:defconfig and powerpc:allmodconfig
builds for 4.0.y and 3.19.y (and it looks like it is still there).
Error log:
include/linux/bug.h: Assembler messages:
include/linux/bug.h:7: Error: unrecognized opcode: `enum'
include/linux/bug.h:8: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,'
include/linux/bug.h:9: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,'
[ and many more similar messages ]
Bisect points to 'powerpc, jump_label: Include linux/jump_label.h to get HAVE_JUMP_LABEL define'.
After reverting the patch in 4.0.y, the files affected by it still compile,
so I don't entirely understand why this patch would be needed in -stable.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists