linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 WIP 1/4] parport: add device-model to parport subsystem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 3 May 2015 09:56:25 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 WIP 1/4] parport: add device-model to parport
 subsystem

Hi Sudip,

On Sun, 3 May 2015 12:07:33 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 04:20:53PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:00:20 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > another WIP for your review. since this is not a formal patch for
> > > applying so writing the comments here.
> > 
> > You should still provide a proper description as if the patch was ready
> > to be committed. Ultimately the descriptions are going to be part of
> > the commits, so they need to be reviewed too.
> > 
> > The history is good to have too for now, but it should go after the
> > "---" separator, as it won't be part of the commit.
> should i then send a v5 of WIP with proper commit message?

Do not resend just for this. But please do it for the next iteration.

> > > (...)
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/parport/parport_pc.c |   4 +-
> > >  drivers/parport/procfs.c     |  15 ++-
> > >  drivers/parport/share.c      | 266 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >  include/linux/parport.h      |  41 ++++++-
> > >  4 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > (...)
> > 
> > Patch tested, no functional regression found.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> Thanks Jean.
> Should i add your Tested-by: to the main patch and the patch
> concerning the changes to i2c-parport?

I have only tested the main patch at this point, I'll test the
i2c-parport changes later today and report then.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/