[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150503090128.GB18048@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 11:01:28 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com, JBeulich@...e.com,
slaoub@...il.com, luto@...capital.net, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
oleg@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
prarit@...hat.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk, jroedel@...e.de,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, macro@...ux-mips.org,
wangnan0@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mce: Define 'SUCCOR' cpuid bit
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> Shall I beef up comment regarding 'overflow_recov' too?
> Something like 'overflow recovery cpuid bit indicates that overflow
> conditions are not fatal'
> would provide a better indication of the usage of the bit IMHO.
Ok.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists