[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55465B2D.6010300@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 13:30:21 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, williams@...hat.com, luto@...nel.org,
fweisbec@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] context_tracking,x86: remove extraneous irq disable
& enable from context tracking on syscall entry
On 05/03/2015 09:23 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Below are v4.1-rc1-172-g6c3c1eb3c35e + patches measurements.
>
> 100M * stat() on isolated cpu
>
> NO_HZ_FULL off inactive housekeeper nohz_full
> real 0m14.266s 0m14.367s 0m20.427s 0m27.921s
> user 0m1.756s 0m1.553s 0m1.976s 0m10.447s
> sys 0m12.508s 0m12.769s 0m18.400s 0m17.464s
> (real) 1.000 1.007 1.431 1.957
> 1.000 1.000
>
> real 0m20.423s 0m27.930s +rik 1,2
> user 0m2.072s 0m10.450s
> sys 0m18.304s 0m17.471s
> vs off 1.431 1.957
> vs prev 1.000 1.000
>
> real 0m20.256s 0m27.803s +paolo 1,2 (2 missing prototypes)
> user 0m1.884s 0m10.551s
> sys 0m18.353s 0m17.242s
> vs off 1.419 1.948
> vs prev .991 .995
>
> real 0m19.122s 0m26.946s +rik 3
> user 0m1.896s 0m10.292s
> sys 0m17.198s 0m16.644s
> vs off 1.340 1.888
> vs prev .944 .969
I'm convinced.
Time to try the remote sampling of CPU use statistics, and
lighten up the RCU overhead of context tracking.
I should be able to start on the remote sampling of CPU use
statistics this week.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists