linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: max732x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent irq controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 May 2015 15:32:31 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Semen Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...ballogic.com>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: max732x: Propagate wake-up setting to parent
 irq controller

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Semen Protsenko
<semen.protsenko@...ballogic.com> wrote:

> Set .irq_set_wake callback to prevent possible issues on wake-up.
>
> This patch was inspired by this commit:
> b80eef95beb04760629822fa130aeed54cdfafca
>
> Signed-off-by: Semen Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...ballogic.com>

Are these real, observed issues?

Patch applied, but it seems we need a general approach to
cover a few GPIO drivers with this kind of thing.

Is this how we should always do it?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/