[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150504142245.GL23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:22:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched / idle: Move the default idle call code to a
separate function
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:56:24PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Move the code under the "use_default" label in cpuidle_idle_call()
> into a separate (new) function.
>
> This just allows the subsequent changes to be more stratightforward.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/idle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,17 @@ void __weak arch_cpu_idle(void)
> local_irq_enable();
> }
>
> +static void default_idle_call(void) {
Please put opening brace of function on a new line.
> + /*
> + * We can't use the cpuidle framework, let's use the default idle
> + * routine.
> + */
> + if (current_clr_polling_and_test())
> + local_irq_enable();
> + else
> + arch_cpu_idle();
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists