lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 04 May 2015 18:24:10 +0300
From:	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
To:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Olivari <mathieu@...eaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] phy: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe PHY

On 05/04/2015 05:35 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Monday 04 May 2015 06:12 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> Add a PCIe PHY driver used by PCIe host controller driver
>> on Qualcomm SoCs like Snapdragon 805.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/phy/Kconfig         |    9 ++
>>   drivers/phy/Makefile        |    1 +
>>   drivers/phy/phy-qcom-pcie.c |  291
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Why do you need a new PHY driver for this? Why not use the existing QCOM
> PHY driver. I can see the registers used here in phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.h?

I agree that on first glance there are similarities, but I'm not sure
does the PHYs are the same IP blocks. Or at least they are different
revisions which have too many differences. So trying to combine them
will lead to more code than now.

Either way I will try to understand how many the differences are.

-- 
regards,
Stan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ