[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150504191421.GJ3829@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 21:14:21 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, yinghai@...nel.org,
x86@...nel.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com, JBeulich@...e.com,
slaoub@...il.com, luto@...capital.net, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
oleg@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
prarit@...hat.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk, jroedel@...e.de,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, macro@...ux-mips.org,
wangnan0@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/mce/amd: Introduce deferred error interrupt
handler
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 02:06:43PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> Is it ok to grow another patch in a V2 for this instead of fixing
> it in this patch since it's a real bug? That should be helpful when
> someone wants to look up git logs of why this was done..
Yes, a prepatch please.
> Yeah, just wanted to keep __log_error() as generic as possible and not
> special case for threshold.
Not important as it is going to be used in mce_amd.c only anyway. It's
main goal is to avoid code duplication - nothing else.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists