linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150504053309.GA28105@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 May 2015 07:33:09 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah.kh@...sung.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@...tec.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.19 000/177] 3.19.7-stable review


* Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:

> On 05/02/2015 12:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.19.7 release.
> >There are 177 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Mon May  4 18:59:31 UTC 2015.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> 
> Take two:
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 125 pass: 112 fail: 13
> Failed builds:
> 	mips:defconfig
> 	mips:allmodconfig
> 	mips:bcm47xx_defconfig
> 	mips:bcm63xx_defconfig
> 	mips:nlm_xlp_defconfig
> 	mips:ath79_defconfig
> 	mips:ar7_defconfig
> 	mips:fuloong2e_defconfig
> 	mips:e55_defconfig
> 	mips:cavium_octeon_defconfig
> 	mips:malta_defconfig
> 	powerpc:defconfig
> 	powerpc:allmodconfig
> 
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 30 pass: 22 fail: 8
> Failed tests:
> 	mips:mips_malta_defconfig
> 	mips:mips_malta_smp_defconfig
> 	mips:mipsel_malta_defconfig
> 	mips:mipsel_malta_smp_defconfig
> 	mips64:mips_malta64_defconfig
> 	mips64:mips_malta64_smp_defconfig
> 	powerpc:ppc64_book3s_defconfig
> 	powerpc:ppc64_book3s_smp_defconfig
> 
> ---
> Error logs:
> 
> mips:
> 
> arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c: In function 'emulate_load_store_insn':
> arch/mips/kernel/unaligned.c:570:4: error: expected '}' before 'else'
> 
> Bisect points to 'MIPS: unaligned: Fix regular load/store instruction
> emulation for EVA'.
> 
> ---
> powerpc:
> 
> include/linux/bug.h: Assembler messages:
> include/linux/bug.h:7: Error: unrecognized opcode: `enum'
> include/linux/bug.h:8: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `,'
> 
> As mentioned earlier, bisect points to 'powerpc, jump_label:
> Include linux/jump_label.h to get HAVE_JUMP_LABEL define'.'.

That commit might be missing its dependencies:

 c0ccf6f99e3a jump_label: Allow jump labels to be used in assembly
 55dd0df781e5 jump_label: Allow asm/jump_label.h to be included in assembly

But I don't think the PowerPC commit should be in -stable to begin 
with, just like the two core patches are not.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/