| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 23:23:22 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched / idle: Reduce the number of branches in the idle loop On Monday, May 04, 2015 04:25:05 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:54:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The "reflect" variable that had to be added to cpuidle_idle_call() to fix a > > regression during the 4.0 cycle has bothered me a bit since then and guess > > what? It is not necessary. > > > > After the last regression fix related to tick_broadcast_exit() I realized > > that it should be possible to eliminate this variable by splitting > > cpuidle_idle_call() into smaller routines and reordering the code in > > question which is done by this patch series. > > > > It also gets rid of one more redundant check while at it. > > > Ooh nice! Yes that thing bothered me too. > > Once you fix that one weird opening bracket: > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org> Fixed and queued up as 4.2 material, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists