linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 07/20] clk: tegra: pll: Don't unconditionally set LOCK flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANLzEksOMYUQ9PxPFmDbHub=eW5u4c6qtduFqeGXYTu3gcOhXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 4 May 2015 14:42:47 -0700
From:	Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
To:	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>
Cc:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/20] clk: tegra: pll: Don't unconditionally set LOCK flags

On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com> wrote:
> SoC specific drivers should define the appropriate flags for each
> PLL rather than relying on the registration functions to automatically
> set flags on their behalf. This will properly allow for changes between
> SoC generations where flags might be different and allow sharing the
> same logic functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>

Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>

-- 
Benson Leung
Software Engineer, Chrom* OS
bleung@...omium.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/