[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28072506.ijDyy3q5rs@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 00:29:10 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: pageexec@...email.hu
Cc: Anisse Astier <anisse@...ier.eu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] PM / Hibernate: fix SANITIZE_FREED_PAGES
On Monday, May 04, 2015 11:50:13 PM PaX Team wrote:
> On 4 May 2015 at 23:16, Anisse Astier wrote:
>
> > SANITIZE_FREED_PAGES feature relies on having all pages going through
> > the free_pages_prepare path in order to be cleared before being used. In
> > the hibernate use case, pages will automagically appear in the system
> > without being cleared.
>
> is this based on debugging/code reading/discussions with hibernation folks
> (i see none of them on CC, added them now) or is it just a brute force attempt
> to fix the symptoms? if the former, it'd be nice to share some more details
> and have Acks from the code owners.
I haven't seen it, for one, and I'm wondering why the "clearing" cannot be done
at the swsusp_free() time?
In any case, please CC hibernation-related patches and discussions thereof to
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists