[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150504061350.GA25540@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 14:13:51 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.it>,
Andreas Steffen <andreas.steffen@...ongswan.org>,
Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Seeding DRBG with more entropy
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 07:40:12AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
> I am not sure that this approach is helpful, because the suggested approach
> implies using a seeded DRNG and the used get_random_bytes already operates as
> a (not always seeded) DRNG. If we have a blocking interface in the kernel, I
> would recommend to make it identical to /dev/random. With the suggested
> seeding approach for DRBG, we definitely have seed data available to start
> with. Therefore, re-seeding it from another seeded DRNG (i.e. the nonblocking
> pool after it is initialized) may not give us too much extra.
My main concern with your original approach was precisely the
fact that get_random_bytes may be called before the before the
kernel pool is ready. So Ted's solution solves that perfectly.
Please do what Ted says and we can all move forward.
Thanks!
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists