[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 11:01:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@....com,
riel@...hat.com, efault@....de, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
inaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
patches@...aro.org, eas-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, juri.lelli@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org,
alex.shi@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: cpufreq_cfs: pelt-based cpu frequency scaling
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 03:10:41PM -0700, Michael Turquette wrote:
> For those that are very curious, there were recently two previous
> postings of these patches to the public eas-dev mailing list. Of
> interest in those threads is the discussion around using a utilization
> threadhold versus purely matching frequency to capacity utilization
> versus using a margin (as this series does):
>
> https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/eas-dev/2015-April/000074.html
> https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/eas-dev/2015-April/000115.html
>
So why wasn't that done here? (and on linux-pm of course)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists