[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 11:51:11 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: André Hentschel <nerv@...ncrow.de>
Cc: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Austin <Jonathan.Austin@....com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathan_lynch@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Preserve the user r/w register tpidr_el0 on
context switch and fork in compat mode
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 05:24:18PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
> From: André Hentschel <nerv@...ncrow.de>
>
> Since commit a4780adeefd042482f624f5e0d577bf9cdcbb760 the user writeable TLS
> register on ARM is preserved per thread.
>
> This patch does it analogous to the ARM patch, but for compat mode on ARM64.
>
> Signed-off-by: André Hentschel <nerv@...ncrow.de>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@....com>
>
> ---
> This patch is against Linux 4.1-rc1 (b787f68c36d49bb1d9236f403813641efa74a031)
Curious, but why do you need this? iirc, we added this for arch/arm/ because
of some windows rt (?) emulation in wine. Is that still the case here and is
anybody actually using that?
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists