[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 12:16:46 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Martin Sperl <kernel@...tin.sperl.org>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 1/5] spi: bcm2835: Add GPIOLIB dependency
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 07:00:55PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/04/2015 05:02 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >not that it matters, but this is the patch in linux-next.
> >I am aware that several other patches have been submitted to fix the
> >problem (I think I have seen at least two); after all, I submitted the
> Follow-up: Since you accepted one of the other patches, please make sure
> to remove my patch from your -next branch; otherwise we might end up
> with dual "depends on GPIOLIB".
*sigh* So, what you're asking me to do here is remove the one that's
actually been applied as a bugfix for Linus. Are you *sure* that's what
you think that's a good idea?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists