[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 13:07:43 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Phil Jensen <pjensen@...rnote.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/221] 3.2.69-rc1 review
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 21:48 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/04/2015 06:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.69 release.
> > There are 221 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri May 08 23:00:00 UTC 2015.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 101 pass: 97 fail: 4
> Failed builds:
> arm:allmodconfig
> mips:allmodconfig
> xtensa:defconfig
> xtensa:allmodconfig
>
> Qemu test results:
> total: 20 pass: 20 fail: 0
>
> Results are as expected.
> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
Thanks for testing.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (812 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists