[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 07:10:19 -0700
From: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, Waiman.Long@...com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/spinlocks: Fix regression in spinlock contention detection
The conversion to signed happens with types shorter than int
(__ticket_t is either u8 or u16).
By changing Raghavendra's program to use unsigned short int, you can
see the problem:
================
#include <stdio.h>
#define LOCK_INC 2
int main()
{
unsigned short int head = 32700, tail=2;
if ((tail - head) > LOCK_INC)
printf(" tail - head > LOCK_INC \n");
else
printf(" tail - head < LOCK_INC \n");
return 0;
}
================
gcc -g -o t main.c
./t
tail - head < LOCK_INC
However, having just unsigned int returns the opposite result
(unsigned int head = 32700, tail=2;)
gcc -g -o t main.c
./t
tail - head > LOCK_INC
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:08:22PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> ================
>> #include <stdio.h>
>>
>> #define LOCK_INC 2
>
> Note that to be completely identical to the kernel code you should've
> written:
>
> #define LOCK_INC ((unsigned int)2)
>
> as per:
>
> #define TICKET_LOCK_INC ((__ticket_t)__TICKET_LOCK_INC)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists